Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9281 - 9290 of 65388 for or b.

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2013
the d/b/a designee—”Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast Wisconsin.” Paul Davis S.E. did not appeal
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93980 - 2014-09-15

Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
. was involuntarily detained pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 51.15 (1)(b)[3]. Police officers removed Theodore S. from his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16985 - 2005-03-31

Tony D. Walker v. Gary R. McCaughtry
and Sunday, July 18, 1999, is day forty-five. However, pursuant to § 990.001(4)(b),[4] when the last day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2640 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of imprisonment as a remedial sanction “if the contempt of court is of a type included in s. 785.01(1)(b).” WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253346 - 2020-02-04

[PDF] State v. Deonte D. Riley
with § 968.29(3)(b). We reverse the order of the circuit court granting Riley’s motion to suppress. Facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19225 - 2017-09-21

Mary Anne Hedrich v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
to Wis. Stat. § 36.13(2)(b)3, to conduct an independent evaluation of her qualifications. The Executive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gordon K. Aaron v. Byron Axel
, V. BYRON AXEL AND LOWELL GOLDMAN, AS INDIVIDUALS AND D/B/A AXEL AND GOLDMAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2343 - 2017-09-19

Thomas N. Tomczak and Mary Ann Tomczak by John Louis Castellani v. Pete L. Bailey
., Defendants, MILDRED B. WOHLFARD, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9768 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wendy Lynne Helgemo v. Board of Bar Examiners
of Columbia. (b) Proof that the applicant has been primarily engaged in the active practice of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16551 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David Watts
under Wisconsin’s rape shield law. See § 972.11(2)(b), STATS.1 Watts does not challenge that ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12962 - 2017-09-21