Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9291 - 9300 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9291 - 9300 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
State v. David G. Rodenkirch
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel T. Van Ornum
of constitutional reasonableness de novo. See id. at 137-38. We conclude that the Fourth Amendment “community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16090 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional reasonableness de novo. See id. at 137-38. We conclude that the Fourth Amendment “community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16090 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas C. Smith
to an undisputed set of facts. The issue is therefore a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
to an undisputed set of facts. The issue is therefore a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
Ronald Rixmann v. Beverly Dehmer
. at 434, 556 N.W.2d at 399, which we review de novo, State v. Irish, 210 Wis.2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13596 - 2005-03-31
. at 434, 556 N.W.2d at 399, which we review de novo, State v. Irish, 210 Wis.2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13596 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶8 In O’Connor’s case, the suspicion that prompted the deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶8 In O’Connor’s case, the suspicion that prompted the deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
Ben Breister v. Valley Bakers Coop Assn.
a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6902 - 2005-03-31
a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6902 - 2005-03-31
Dunn County v. Kelly D.
of Wis. Stat. § 48.29, a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kywanda F., 200 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3125 - 2005-03-31
of Wis. Stat. § 48.29, a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kywanda F., 200 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3125 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. Teresa B.
the trial court's decision de novo. See Breier v. E.C., 130 Wis.2d 376, 381, 387 N.W.2d 72, 74 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10158 - 2005-03-31
the trial court's decision de novo. See Breier v. E.C., 130 Wis.2d 376, 381, 387 N.W.2d 72, 74 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the standard for reasonable suspicion. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789574 - 2024-04-17
N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the standard for reasonable suspicion. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789574 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
State v. Dennis C. Marth
of counsel presents a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶6 On appeal, Marth argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5075 - 2017-09-19
of counsel presents a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶6 On appeal, Marth argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5075 - 2017-09-19