Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 931 - 940 of 63681 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 931 - 940 of 63681 for Motion for joint custody.
Bartlett Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board
-Appellant, v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board, City of Baraboo and Cheryl Giese, in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3528 - 2005-03-31
-Appellant, v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board, City of Baraboo and Cheryl Giese, in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bartlett Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board
, V. CITY OF BARABOO JOINT REVIEW BOARD, CITY OF BARABOO AND CHERYL GIESE, IN HER OFFICIAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3528 - 2017-09-19
, V. CITY OF BARABOO JOINT REVIEW BOARD, CITY OF BARABOO AND CHERYL GIESE, IN HER OFFICIAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3528 - 2017-09-19
Kimberly K. Hotz v. Russell L. Hotz
. At that time, the parties agreed to joint custody of their three minor children with primary physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8013 - 2005-03-31
. At that time, the parties agreed to joint custody of their three minor children with primary physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8013 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kimberly K. Hotz v. Russell L. Hotz
. At that time, the parties agreed to joint custody of their three minor children with primary physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8013 - 2017-09-19
. At that time, the parties agreed to joint custody of their three minor children with primary physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8013 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his postjudgment motion. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 J.S. is the biological father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163156 - 2017-09-21
the order denying his postjudgment motion. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 J.S. is the biological father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
, the judgment of conviction listed the amount as $11,882.72. Pringle filed a postconviction motion to reduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26448 - 2017-09-21
, the judgment of conviction listed the amount as $11,882.72. Pringle filed a postconviction motion to reduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26448 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
. Pringle filed a postconviction motion to reduce the restitution amount to $1,566.89, the amount of the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
. Pringle filed a postconviction motion to reduce the restitution amount to $1,566.89, the amount of the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
[MS WORD]
FA-4163VB: Order on Motion Converting Legal Separation to Divorce
1 Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: Enter the name
/formdisplay/FA-4163VB.doc?formNumber=FA-4163VB&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2019-03-18
1 Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: Enter the name
/formdisplay/FA-4163VB.doc?formNumber=FA-4163VB&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2019-03-18
Juanita Randall v. Wayne Felt
of the joint accounts litigated in the probate proceeding. Accordingly, although we affirm the appealed order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4423 - 2005-03-31
of the joint accounts litigated in the probate proceeding. Accordingly, although we affirm the appealed order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4423 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Juanita Randall v. Wayne Felt
the validity of the joint accounts litigated in the probate proceeding. Accordingly, although we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4423 - 2017-09-19
the validity of the joint accounts litigated in the probate proceeding. Accordingly, although we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4423 - 2017-09-19