Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9311 - 9320 of 90071 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 9311 - 9320 of 90071 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
[PDF]
State v. Samuel E. Post
. APPEAL from an order of the Circuit Court for Dane County, Stuart A. Schwartz, Judge. Reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16944 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from an order of the Circuit Court for Dane County, Stuart A. Schwartz, Judge. Reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163995 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 25
COUNTY: Waukesha JUDGE: Ralph Ramirez JUSTICES: CONCURRED: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32310 - 2014-09-15
COUNTY: Waukesha JUDGE: Ralph Ramirez JUSTICES: CONCURRED: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32310 - 2014-09-15
State v. Harry Montey
of the circuit court for Dane County: mark a. frankel, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Dane County: mark a. frankel, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harry Montey
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: MARK A. FRANKEL, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: MARK A. FRANKEL, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13694 - 2014-09-15
Rule Order
to be relevant. (2) The denial of the use of videoconferencing technology is not appealable. 885.58 Use in civil
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32608 - 2008-04-30
to be relevant. (2) The denial of the use of videoconferencing technology is not appealable. 885.58 Use in civil
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32608 - 2008-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin v. F.A.G.-C. (L.C. # 2022TP196) Before Donald, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
of Wisconsin v. F.A.G.-C. (L.C. # 2022TP196) Before Donald, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin v. F.A.G.-C. (L.C. # 2022TP196) Before Donald, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
of Wisconsin v. F.A.G.-C. (L.C. # 2022TP196) Before Donald, J.1 Summary disposition orders may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2021AP381-NM Kenosha County DHS v. J.C.T. (L.C. #2019TP91) Before Gundrum, J.1 Summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398516 - 2021-07-28
2021AP381-NM Kenosha County DHS v. J.C.T. (L.C. #2019TP91) Before Gundrum, J.1 Summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398516 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOHN DiMOTTO, Judge. Affirmed. ΒΆ1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100543 - 2017-09-21
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOHN DiMOTTO, Judge. Affirmed. ΒΆ1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100543 - 2017-09-21