Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9311 - 9320 of 50071 for our.
Search results 9311 - 9320 of 50071 for our.
State v. Robert T. Langston
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
CA Blank Order
. Klemstein was advised of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104999 - 2013-12-02
. Klemstein was advised of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104999 - 2013-12-02
CA Blank Order
discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138259 - 2015-03-19
discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138259 - 2015-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829715 - 2024-07-23
a response. Upon our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829715 - 2024-07-23
CA Blank Order
to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98169 - 2013-06-17
to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98169 - 2013-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
op. (WI App Jan. 3, 2013). On remand, in response to our request for explanation regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
op. (WI App Jan. 3, 2013). On remand, in response to our request for explanation regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Sheriff Grady Hartman. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699983 - 2023-09-06
Sheriff Grady Hartman. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699983 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was denied the procedural right to present evidence at the disciplinary hearing. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158278 - 2017-09-21
was denied the procedural right to present evidence at the disciplinary hearing. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Similarly, our review of the record reveals no basis for such a claim. Therefore, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220608 - 2018-10-03
. Similarly, our review of the record reveals no basis for such a claim. Therefore, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220608 - 2018-10-03