Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 49955 for civil+disposition+summary+.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 49955 for civil+disposition+summary+.
Richard Herbert Voigt v. City of Merrill
a motion for summary judgment arguing that it was immune from liability under ยง 893.80(4). The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4304 - 2005-03-31
a motion for summary judgment arguing that it was immune from liability under ยง 893.80(4). The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4304 - 2005-03-31
Lydia Santiago v. Kathleen Ware
. Because of our disposition, we do not reach the issue of qualified immunity.[1] We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8493 - 2005-03-31
. Because of our disposition, we do not reach the issue of qualified immunity.[1] We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lydia Santiago v. Kathleen Ware
and unauthorized conduct defense. Because of our disposition, we do not reach the issue of qualified immunity.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8493 - 2017-09-19
and unauthorized conduct defense. Because of our disposition, we do not reach the issue of qualified immunity.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8493 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Monroe County v. Jennifer V.
for summary judgment2 on the ground that there was no factual dispute that Jennifer was convicted as alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9924 - 2017-09-19
for summary judgment2 on the ground that there was no factual dispute that Jennifer was convicted as alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9924 - 2017-09-19
Monroe County v. Jennifer V.
. Monroe County moved for summary judgment[2] on the ground that there was no factual dispute that Jennifer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
. Monroe County moved for summary judgment[2] on the ground that there was no factual dispute that Jennifer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Based on the respondents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190394 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Based on the respondents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190394 - 2017-09-21
Duane Flesch v. Charles Wranosky
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM. Duane Flesch appeals a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12146 - 2005-03-31
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM. Duane Flesch appeals a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12146 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275221 - 2020-08-05
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275221 - 2020-08-05
[PDF]
Legend Diamonds, Inc. v. Diamond Cutters of Milwaukee
month after the response deadline. Because dispositive facts were admitted, the court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4511 - 2017-09-19
month after the response deadline. Because dispositive facts were admitted, the court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Kloppenburg, P.J., Blanchard, and Taylor, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10
Kloppenburg, P.J., Blanchard, and Taylor, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10