Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 68517 for did.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 68517 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
2 and subsequent to his arrest, asserting that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
2 and subsequent to his arrest, asserting that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
Town of East Troy v. Village of East Troy
on August 11. Although the board had other matters on the agenda that night, the chairman of the board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19731 - 2005-09-27
on August 11. Although the board had other matters on the agenda that night, the chairman of the board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19731 - 2005-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
concentration. He contends the police officer who arrested him did not have probable cause to do so and thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
concentration. He contends the police officer who arrested him did not have probable cause to do so and thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that he is entitled to resentencing on grounds that the circuit court did not articulate its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73368 - 2011-11-08
contends that he is entitled to resentencing on grounds that the circuit court did not articulate its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73368 - 2011-11-08
State v. Eureka Scruggs
conclude that the trial court considered the relevant factors and did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court considered the relevant factors and did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
State v. One 19__ Harley Davidson FLH Motorcycle
Identification Number and because the State failed to prove its case. Because the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11428 - 2005-03-31
Identification Number and because the State failed to prove its case. Because the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradley G. Genrich
and that the failure to do so violated his due process right to present a defense. We conclude that the evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24519 - 2017-09-21
and that the failure to do so violated his due process right to present a defense. We conclude that the evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24519 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth Haug
to live with her mother. There was evidence that M. did not want to live in Wisconsin with her father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10018 - 2005-03-31
to live with her mother. There was evidence that M. did not want to live in Wisconsin with her father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10018 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence did not support the jury’s verdict that the Marinette County Health and Human Services Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31511 - 2008-01-14
the evidence did not support the jury’s verdict that the Marinette County Health and Human Services Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31511 - 2008-01-14