Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 50100 for our.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 50100 for our.
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
809.32, Stats. Ratcliff has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
809.32, Stats. Ratcliff has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the No. 2019AP589-CR 2 briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259151 - 2020-05-06
. Based upon our review of the No. 2019AP589-CR 2 briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259151 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
revocation of her probation. Laper filed a response raising several issues. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92923 - 2014-09-15
revocation of her probation. Laper filed a response raising several issues. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92923 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122270 - 2014-09-18
of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122270 - 2014-09-18
CA Blank Order
that a challenge to the circuit court’s decision at sentencing would lack arguable merit. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147480 - 2015-09-01
that a challenge to the circuit court’s decision at sentencing would lack arguable merit. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147480 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andrew J. Hawe
the test was taken and the presumption may not be accorded. ¶3 We reject this theory based on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7573 - 2005-03-31
the test was taken and the presumption may not be accorded. ¶3 We reject this theory based on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7573 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, ¶23
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102040 - 2013-09-15
must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, ¶23
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102040 - 2013-09-15
CA Blank Order
to a reduction in the length of his sentence because the sentence was unduly harsh and excessive. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102304 - 2013-10-01
to a reduction in the length of his sentence because the sentence was unduly harsh and excessive. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102304 - 2013-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138408 - 2017-09-21
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138408 - 2017-09-21