Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 50107 for our.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is the circuit court’s imposition of sentence following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300024 - 2020-10-29
is the circuit court’s imposition of sentence following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300024 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
meritorious issues that would support a motion for a new trial. Based upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252920 - 2020-01-29
meritorious issues that would support a motion for a new trial. Based upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252920 - 2020-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Cunningham v. State, 76 Wis. 2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65 (1977). No. 2019AP1548-CRNM 3 Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254220 - 2020-02-19
. Cunningham v. State, 76 Wis. 2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65 (1977). No. 2019AP1548-CRNM 3 Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254220 - 2020-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
version unless otherwise noted. No. 2018AP916-FT 2 upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239914 - 2019-04-30
version unless otherwise noted. No. 2018AP916-FT 2 upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239914 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
op. (WI App Jan. 3, 2013). On remand, in response to our request for explanation regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
op. (WI App Jan. 3, 2013). On remand, in response to our request for explanation regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP1942-CRNM 2 file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206760 - 2018-01-09
. No. 2017AP1942-CRNM 2 file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206760 - 2018-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138408 - 2017-09-21
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138408 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to a reduction in the length of his sentence because the sentence was unduly harsh and excessive. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102304 - 2013-10-01
to a reduction in the length of his sentence because the sentence was unduly harsh and excessive. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102304 - 2013-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
State v. Kurt W. Meyer
Meyer’s motion on this issue without a hearing. However, our review of the record shows that this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5750 - 2005-03-31
Meyer’s motion on this issue without a hearing. However, our review of the record shows that this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5750 - 2005-03-31