Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 50100 for our.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 50100 for our.
CA Blank Order
. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109014 - 2014-03-18
. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109014 - 2014-03-18
CA Blank Order
discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138259 - 2015-03-19
discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138259 - 2015-03-19
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104949 - 2013-11-25
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104949 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229885 - 2018-12-06
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229885 - 2018-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105252 - 2017-09-21
in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105252 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829715 - 2024-07-23
a response. Upon our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829715 - 2024-07-23
County of Winnebago v. Roy D. Wicklund
U.S. 1153 (2001), which relied on our supreme court’s decision in State v. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3638 - 2005-03-31
U.S. 1153 (2001), which relied on our supreme court’s decision in State v. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court erred in denying his petition because he is indigent and will prevail on appeal. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794198 - 2024-05-01
court erred in denying his petition because he is indigent and will prevail on appeal. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794198 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879185 - 2024-11-20
. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879185 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of this affects our analysis of this no-merit appeal. Nos. 2024AP680-CRNM 2024AP681-CRNM 2024AP682
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30
of this affects our analysis of this no-merit appeal. Nos. 2024AP680-CRNM 2024AP681-CRNM 2024AP682
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30