Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 63197 for records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be attributed to the State. We disagree. The record shows that the delay between March 7, 2011 and May 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237927 - 2019-03-26

Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s findings; therefore, damages need not be retried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15509 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s findings; therefore, damages need not be retried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14955 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James R. Thiel
. a. Telephone records. ¶18 The State first challenges the circuit court’s conclusion that Thiel’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4071 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that are reasonable or enforceable. ¶2 We conclude that the record refutes A.Z.’s first three arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622972 - 2023-02-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
proceed. When the case was called on the record, De Peters told the court that she was asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699350 - 2023-09-06

COURT OF APPEALS
to object to the admission of videotaped testimony from the victim recorded in 2007; (2) the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99009 - 2013-07-08

State v. James R. Thiel
. a. Telephone records. ¶18 The State first challenges the circuit court’s conclusion that Thiel’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4071 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s findings; therefore, damages need not be retried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15509 - 2017-09-21

Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s findings; therefore, damages need not be retried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14955 - 2005-03-31