Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9321 - 9330 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".

[PDF] Emerson Electric Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Wrecking Co., v. LIRC, 114 Wis. 2d 504, 508, 339 N.W.2d 344 (Ct. App. 1983). “In reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7356 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Garth E. Coates
v. Daniels, 117 Wis.2d 9, 17, 343 N.W.2d 411, 415-16 (Ct. App. 1983). Coates' trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8747 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James J. Bartow
not be unequivocally correct or even more likely correct than not. Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Carol J. Apyan v. George H. Easton
(Ct. App. 1983). 3 The court decided numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26203 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jesse Rodgers
consideration of new factors. State v. Macemon, 113 Wis.2d 662, 668, 335 N.W.2d 402, 406 (1983). A new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11061 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Edward D. Werchowski
was discretionary. State v. Macemon, 113 Wis.2d 662, 667-68, 335 N.W.2d 402, 405-06 (1983). Sentencing courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9992 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John M. Shelley
(1983), and thereby conclude that because the State was ultimately successful in obtaining the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12637 - 2017-09-21

State v. John Robert John
, we do not address this argument. Sweet v. Berge, 113 Wis. 2d 61, 67, 334 N.W.2d 559 (Ct. App. 1983)
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3315 - 2005-03-31

Jeff Pettis v. John Close
in support of that determination. Wassenaar v. Panos, 111 Wis. 2d 518, 525, 331 N.W.2d 357 (1983). ANALYSIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3609 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
(1983)). “Deciding a motion for sentence modification based on a new factor is a two-step inquiry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974172 - 2025-06-25