Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9331 - 9340 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 9331 - 9340 of 16449 for commentating.
[PDF]
Louise O'Gorman v. Michael O'Gorman
and hearing their arguments. The court commented: (1) “[a]ny credit granted under [WIS. STAT. § 767.32(1r
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2150 - 2017-09-19
and hearing their arguments. The court commented: (1) “[a]ny credit granted under [WIS. STAT. § 767.32(1r
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2150 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The defendant’s motion referenced the Court’s comments out of context. The Court did not solely consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31883 - 2014-09-15
. The defendant’s motion referenced the Court’s comments out of context. The Court did not solely consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in his own practices. Schimel commented on the reactions of the victims and their families
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150270 - 2017-09-21
in his own practices. Schimel commented on the reactions of the victims and their families
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150270 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
these pictures would not act on them given the chance.” These comments exhibit recognition by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54987 - 2010-10-04
these pictures would not act on them given the chance.” These comments exhibit recognition by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54987 - 2010-10-04
State v. Bruce J. Kuechler
of the law but had no comment on the appropriate fine. We agree with Kuechler that “[i]t is not clear why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5225 - 2005-03-31
of the law but had no comment on the appropriate fine. We agree with Kuechler that “[i]t is not clear why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric T. Scott
comments at sentencing on the convictions here, Nos. 04-1687-CR, 04-1688-CR, 04-1689-CR, 04-1690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17895 - 2017-09-21
comments at sentencing on the convictions here, Nos. 04-1687-CR, 04-1688-CR, 04-1689-CR, 04-1690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17895 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sentencing discretion. We agree with counsel’s analysis on these issues; however, we comment briefly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948668 - 2025-04-30
sentencing discretion. We agree with counsel’s analysis on these issues; however, we comment briefly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948668 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
Kelly S. Lee v. James M. Kent
commented to Kelly, “It doesn’t seem like you are working enough hours per year, per month, per week here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2779 - 2017-09-19
commented to Kelly, “It doesn’t seem like you are working enough hours per year, per month, per week here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2779 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. George C. Harrell
noteworthy that in its sentencing comments, the trial court did not state that Harrell was supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4205 - 2017-09-19
noteworthy that in its sentencing comments, the trial court did not state that Harrell was supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4205 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Vargas
will not review invited error). We feel compelled, however, to comment on the impropriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31
will not review invited error). We feel compelled, however, to comment on the impropriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31