Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9331 - 9340 of 82874 for simple case search.
Search results 9331 - 9340 of 82874 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a blood sample is a search and seizure within the meanings of the United States and Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98498 - 2013-06-24
of a blood sample is a search and seizure within the meanings of the United States and Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98498 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress the results of a nonconsensual warrantless blood draw. The taking of a blood sample is a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98498 - 2014-09-15
to suppress the results of a nonconsensual warrantless blood draw. The taking of a blood sample is a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98498 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the odor of marijuana coming from his vehicle. The officers conducted a search of Parks’ vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431151 - 2021-09-28
the odor of marijuana coming from his vehicle. The officers conducted a search of Parks’ vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431151 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances of the case. See Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d 648, ¶35. To prove prejudice, the parent must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97440 - 2014-09-15
the circumstances of the case. See Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d 648, ¶35. To prove prejudice, the parent must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97440 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Schwartz
in certain cases to help explain the meaning of that behavior.” State v. Jensen, 147 Wis.2d 240, 250, 432
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15159 - 2017-09-21
in certain cases to help explain the meaning of that behavior.” State v. Jensen, 147 Wis.2d 240, 250, 432
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15159 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward J. Schwartz
is admissible in certain cases to help explain the meaning of that behavior.” State v. Jensen, 147 Wis.2d 240
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15159 - 2005-03-31
is admissible in certain cases to help explain the meaning of that behavior.” State v. Jensen, 147 Wis.2d 240
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15159 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
or omissions were objectively unreasonable under all the circumstances of the case. See Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97440 - 2013-06-04
or omissions were objectively unreasonable under all the circumstances of the case. See Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97440 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senator Respondents
SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response Brief of Wisconsin Legislature and Republic... Filed 10-30-2023
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefrepsen.pdf - 2023-10-30
SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response Brief of Wisconsin Legislature and Republic... Filed 10-30-2023
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefrepsen.pdf - 2023-10-30
[PDF]
State v. Armando M. Tia
since a search of Tia's residence nine days after the 911 call did not yield a weapon. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8102 - 2017-09-19
since a search of Tia's residence nine days after the 911 call did not yield a weapon. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8102 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patrick Martin
). We agree that the search violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31
). We agree that the search violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31