Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9341 - 9350 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9341 - 9350 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
State v. Donald A. Lesavage
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15410 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15410 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128516 - 2017-09-21
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128516 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Blair C. Penchoff
, whether a stop meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5474 - 2017-09-19
, whether a stop meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5474 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony T. Blue
is subject to de novo review. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544, 547, 335 N.W.2d 399 (1983). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4105 - 2017-09-20
is subject to de novo review. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544, 547, 335 N.W.2d 399 (1983). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4105 - 2017-09-20
State v. David G. Rodenkirch
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
in § 802.08(2), Stats. Id. We review a summary judgment determination de novo, independent of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
in § 802.08(2), Stats. Id. We review a summary judgment determination de novo, independent of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James E. Jahnke v. Dennis Brown
which we review de novo. See Koenings v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 126 Wis. 2d 349, 366, 377 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2267 - 2017-09-19
which we review de novo. See Koenings v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 126 Wis. 2d 349, 366, 377 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2267 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Franklin A. Barton
performance is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. Because we agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7740 - 2017-09-19
performance is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. Because we agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7740 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
they are clearly erroneous, but we determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate a knowing, intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27922 - 2007-01-29
they are clearly erroneous, but we determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate a knowing, intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27922 - 2007-01-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We first address Frier’s contention that her detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We first address Frier’s contention that her detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29301 - 2014-09-15