Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9351 - 9360 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 9351 - 9360 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based on reasoning that differs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based on reasoning that differs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Carl R. Kramer
2000 WI App 271 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 271 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement should have been suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
statement should have been suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures because they did not have actual or apparent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32064 - 2008-03-10
Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures because they did not have actual or apparent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32064 - 2008-03-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
He contends police violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32064 - 2014-09-15
He contends police violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32064 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cedric Holze
in his case; (2) there was insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that he possessed a pictorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6559 - 2017-09-19
in his case; (2) there was insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that he possessed a pictorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6559 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cedric Holze
contends that: (1) § 948.12 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
contends that: (1) § 948.12 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was enhanced as provided in Wis. Stat. § 961.49(1m)(b)6. because it occurred within 1000 feet of a school. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66110 - 2011-06-21
was enhanced as provided in Wis. Stat. § 961.49(1m)(b)6. because it occurred within 1000 feet of a school. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66110 - 2011-06-21
CA Blank Order
to the criminal complaint in case No. 2011CM4619, which underlies appeal No. 2014AP868-CRNM, Johnson entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121891 - 2014-09-14
to the criminal complaint in case No. 2011CM4619, which underlies appeal No. 2014AP868-CRNM, Johnson entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121891 - 2014-09-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 961.49(1m)(b)6. because it occurred within 1000 feet of a school. We affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66110 - 2014-09-15
. § 961.49(1m)(b)6. because it occurred within 1000 feet of a school. We affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66110 - 2014-09-15