Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9371 - 9380 of 82948 for case search.
Search results 9371 - 9380 of 82948 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
State v. Robert John Kotz
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The federal and state constitutions protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61616 - 2011-03-23
The federal and state constitutions protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61616 - 2011-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
of Wisconsin v. Daniel G. Latimer (L. C. Case No. 2020CF946) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Harrison M. Marcum v. Donald Gudmanson
, but concluded that the defendants “accurately state the facts and applicable law.” It appears the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11777 - 2017-09-20
, but concluded that the defendants “accurately state the facts and applicable law.” It appears the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11777 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Kueffer, and Dexter lived with Schoessow. Because Schoessow’s involvement in the case has been limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
Kueffer, and Dexter lived with Schoessow. Because Schoessow’s involvement in the case has been limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 14
2025 WI APP 14 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2024AP332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904271 - 2025-03-25
2025 WI APP 14 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2024AP332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904271 - 2025-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Scott E. Williams
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J. This case is before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16876 - 2017-09-21
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J. This case is before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16876 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott E. Williams
of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J. This case is before the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16876 - 2005-03-31
of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J. This case is before the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16876 - 2005-03-31