Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9371 - 9380 of 50071 for our.
Search results 9371 - 9380 of 50071 for our.
CA Blank Order
revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105252 - 2013-12-03
revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105252 - 2013-12-03
CA Blank Order
portion of the assessment from the date of closing to the end of 2011. Upon our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119837 - 2014-08-18
portion of the assessment from the date of closing to the end of 2011. Upon our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119837 - 2014-08-18
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92790 - 2013-02-11
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92790 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶5 The outcome of this case is dictated by our decision in Goodson. There, we observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52437 - 2010-07-26
. DISCUSSION ¶5 The outcome of this case is dictated by our decision in Goodson. There, we observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52437 - 2010-07-26
State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Bryce Garrett v. Gerald Berge
supports it, and we do not substitute our view of the evidence for the committee’s. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
supports it, and we do not substitute our view of the evidence for the committee’s. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lothar W. Penkert
that Penkert’s brief outlines four appellate issues; however, our understanding of his arguments leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11972 - 2017-09-21
that Penkert’s brief outlines four appellate issues; however, our understanding of his arguments leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals an order affirming a decision revoking his extended supervision. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171781 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order affirming a decision revoking his extended supervision. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence and placed Johnson on probation for three years on each count. In our order of December 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110003 - 2017-09-21
sentence and placed Johnson on probation for three years on each count. In our order of December 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110487 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110487 - 2017-09-21