Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9381 - 9390 of 64235 for records/1000.
Search results 9381 - 9390 of 64235 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
of the Kruzycki factors. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court carefully considered the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28258 - 2007-02-28
of the Kruzycki factors. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court carefully considered the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28258 - 2007-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088934 - 2026-03-11
and has not responded. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088934 - 2026-03-11
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106647 - 2014-01-13
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106647 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92790 - 2014-09-15
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92790 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253620 - 2020-02-12
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253620 - 2020-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as No. 2013AP704-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100720 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as No. 2013AP704-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donnie L.B.
in for restitution purposes. Nos. 98-2341-FT 98-2342-FT 3 appellate record which reveals that Donnie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14381 - 2014-09-15
in for restitution purposes. Nos. 98-2341-FT 98-2342-FT 3 appellate record which reveals that Donnie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14381 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rodney Dombrowski
, no colloquy was required and this court may examine the totality of the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5774 - 2005-03-31
, no colloquy was required and this court may examine the totality of the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5774 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and was advised of his right to file a response. He has not done so. Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095345 - 2026-03-25
and was advised of his right to file a response. He has not done so. Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095345 - 2026-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104999 - 2017-09-21
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104999 - 2017-09-21