Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9391 - 9400 of 50107 for our.
Search results 9391 - 9400 of 50107 for our.
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
809.32, Stats. Ratcliff has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2012-06-04
809.32, Stats. Ratcliff has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2012-06-04
Nancy Hanson and Larry Hanson v. Village of Balsam Lake
is to ascertain the legislature’s intent, and our first resort is to the statutory language itself. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2250 - 2012-02-20
is to ascertain the legislature’s intent, and our first resort is to the statutory language itself. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2250 - 2012-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
We note that the guilty plea waiver rule does not deprive us of our subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27
We note that the guilty plea waiver rule does not deprive us of our subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110487 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110487 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132564 - 2017-09-21
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Perkins appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
. Perkins appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
further. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107292 - 2017-09-21
further. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107292 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of both the sentence imposed and in declaring Faulkner ineligible for prison programming. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562088 - 2022-09-07
of both the sentence imposed and in declaring Faulkner ineligible for prison programming. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562088 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as party to a crime. Clemons was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194599 - 2017-09-21
, as party to a crime. Clemons was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194599 - 2017-09-21