Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9391 - 9400 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 9391 - 9400 of 58542 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 948.025(1)(e) (2003-04, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2009-10). 1 Garcia argues that the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141135 - 2017-09-21
. § 948.025(1)(e) (2003-04, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2009-10). 1 Garcia argues that the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141135 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment to Simandl & Murray, S.C. Mainstreet argues that the trial court erred in granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50325 - 2014-09-15
judgment to Simandl & Murray, S.C. Mainstreet argues that the trial court erred in granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50325 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred in ruling that probable cause supported her arrest, in barring her defense of legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28236 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred in ruling that probable cause supported her arrest, in barring her defense of legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28236 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Brandt claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28105 - 2014-09-15
. Brandt claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28105 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03
postconviction motion. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03
State v. David E. Sanders
for a new trial. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] David E. Sanders appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5770 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] David E. Sanders appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5770 - 2005-03-31
State v. Doris B.
. She also contends that the trial court misused its discretion in admitting certain evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10274 - 2005-03-31
. She also contends that the trial court misused its discretion in admitting certain evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David E. Sanders
remanded for a new trial. ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 David E. Sanders appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5770 - 2017-09-19
remanded for a new trial. ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 David E. Sanders appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5770 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Theodore D. Kraig
to the theft; the trial court did not err by failing to sua sponte prohibit testimony about a videotape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2593 - 2017-09-19
to the theft; the trial court did not err by failing to sua sponte prohibit testimony about a videotape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2593 - 2017-09-19
State v. Andre D. Crockett
in the trial court. We conclude that the State’s failure to argue waiver does not prohibit this court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3247 - 2005-03-31
in the trial court. We conclude that the State’s failure to argue waiver does not prohibit this court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3247 - 2005-03-31