Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 941 - 950 of 6659 for mix.
Search results 941 - 950 of 6659 for mix.
CA Blank Order
alleges sufficient facts to entitle the defendant to a hearing is a mixed standard of review. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95486 - 2013-04-10
alleges sufficient facts to entitle the defendant to a hearing is a mixed standard of review. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95486 - 2013-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
1, ¶8. We review questions of constitutional fact under a mixed standard of review, upholding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42991 - 2009-11-02
1, ¶8. We review questions of constitutional fact under a mixed standard of review, upholding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42991 - 2009-11-02
State v. Javier Belmontes
present mixed questions of law and fact. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15433 - 2005-03-31
present mixed questions of law and fact. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15433 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C. Ziegler
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel present mixed questions of law and fact. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15987 - 2017-09-21
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel present mixed questions of law and fact. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Vandenheuvel
if the question was treated as a mixed question of fact and law. No. 2006AP264-CR 5 ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
if the question was treated as a mixed question of fact and law. No. 2006AP264-CR 5 ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2007 WI 60, ¶8, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634. “A question of constitutional fact is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51291 - 2014-09-15
, 2007 WI 60, ¶8, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634. “A question of constitutional fact is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51291 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review under a mixed standard. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶19, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51998 - 2014-09-15
review under a mixed standard. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶19, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51998 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steven A. Conway
that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered are ordinarily reviewed as mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered are ordinarily reviewed as mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
State v. Max P. Funmaker, Jr.
-of-another were not clearly delineated, and were mixed in with the instructions on the lesser included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14133 - 2005-03-31
-of-another were not clearly delineated, and were mixed in with the instructions on the lesser included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in a normal agricultural practice under § NR 10.07(2)(b)5. ¶6 The State’s argument presents a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50176 - 2014-09-15
in a normal agricultural practice under § NR 10.07(2)(b)5. ¶6 The State’s argument presents a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50176 - 2014-09-15

