Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 941 - 950 of 49819 for our.
Search results 941 - 950 of 49819 for our.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the defendant. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94723 - 2014-09-15
the defendant. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94723 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his presentence investigation report (PSI) was incomplete. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182507 - 2017-09-21
that his presentence investigation report (PSI) was incomplete. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the sufficiency of the evidence. The no-merit report does not address this issue. However, based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310077 - 2020-12-03
to the sufficiency of the evidence. The no-merit report does not address this issue. However, based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310077 - 2020-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806851 - 2024-05-29
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806851 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
to use our discretionary reversal power under WIS. STAT. § 752.35. We may reverse a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32797 - 2014-09-15
to use our discretionary reversal power under WIS. STAT. § 752.35. We may reverse a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32797 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Wallstreet and his brother committed an armed robbery similar to this one; and (4) we should exercise our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213728 - 2018-05-31
that Wallstreet and his brother committed an armed robbery similar to this one; and (4) we should exercise our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213728 - 2018-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
%, the individual is even more impaired. DISCUSSION ¶7 Ford asks us to use our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32797 - 2008-05-27
%, the individual is even more impaired. DISCUSSION ¶7 Ford asks us to use our discretionary reversal power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32797 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2021-22 version. No. 2023AP774-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
are to the 2021-22 version. No. 2023AP774-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Peter T. Kupaza
was convicted and he appealed. In our decision affirming his conviction, we described the prosecution’s “dog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25283 - 2017-09-21
was convicted and he appealed. In our decision affirming his conviction, we described the prosecution’s “dog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25283 - 2017-09-21