Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9401 - 9410 of 15596 for fee.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the recovery of attorney fees and expenses incurred in defending the Gilbert lawsuit after Chicago Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70333 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, it is obvious that both of the[] ... parties assumed interest and/or late fees would be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77362 - 2012-01-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the hundred-dollar-fee requirement in WIS. STAT. § 301.45(10) was an unconstitutional ex post facto provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15

Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Kellberg
. Section 19.37(2) governs costs, fees and damages for such mandamus actions and provides that a "court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13968 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of Hroscikoski’s missing belongings, plus attorney and court fees, totaling $4,200. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07

Matthew K. Oda v. Port Washington State Bank
moves for the award of attorney fees and costs because the Odas’ appeal is frivolous. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19768 - 2005-10-04

COURT OF APPEALS
invoice, and a $3.00 handling fee. The notice directed Carey to pay $368.66 by the due date of May 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32538 - 2008-04-28

Gelbert Martinez v. Jefferson Insurance
. harmless for any loss, damage or expense, including attorney’s fees, incurred by JUNG BROS., resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11382 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the filing fee or to seek to waive that fee. In 2006, Claudio filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34384 - 2008-10-27

Russell C. Winchel v. State Bank of Cross Plains
, and awarded frivolous costs and fees to the bank. The Winchels challenge each of these rulings. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7093 - 2005-03-31