Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9401 - 9410 of 63199 for records.
Search results 9401 - 9410 of 63199 for records.
State v. Brian W. Shaw
rely in part on the record of the first sentencing hearing. See State v. Martin, 121 Wis.2d 670, 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
rely in part on the record of the first sentencing hearing. See State v. Martin, 121 Wis.2d 670, 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123663 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Pierce County v. Ryan P.
of good cause in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7552 - 2017-09-19
of good cause in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7552 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently examining the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209195 - 2018-02-28
independently examining the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209195 - 2018-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
State v. Carl J. Knapp
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick A. Hayden
reviewed the record. We conclude that an appeal would lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8395 - 2017-09-19
reviewed the record. We conclude that an appeal would lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8395 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
Woodland Hills Land Company v. County of Door
very little authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9542 - 2005-03-31
very little authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9542 - 2005-03-31