Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9401 - 9410 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9401 - 9410 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr. v. Mary C. Volker
to harass her. The record fully supports these conclusions. We therefore affirm. An abuse of process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7769 - 2017-09-19
to harass her. The record fully supports these conclusions. We therefore affirm. An abuse of process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7769 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108198 - 2017-09-21
809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
State v. Paul L. George
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further appellate proceedings would lack arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further appellate proceedings would lack arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
, and the evidence of record supports the decision. See State ex rel. Ortega v. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
, and the evidence of record supports the decision. See State ex rel. Ortega v. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615611 - 2023-02-01
and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615611 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Mario Harris
The postconviction court reviewed the trial record and also considered trial counsel’s affidavit acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16183 - 2017-09-21
The postconviction court reviewed the trial record and also considered trial counsel’s affidavit acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Woodland Hills Land Company v. County of Door
authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9542 - 2017-09-19
authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9542 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26