Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9411 - 9420 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9411 - 9420 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in accordance with WIS. STAT. [RULE] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15
in accordance with WIS. STAT. [RULE] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
State v. Andrew James Garner
of burglarious tools, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
of burglarious tools, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
State v. Andrew James Garner
motion. He argues that the trial court violated his right to due process of law by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31
motion. He argues that the trial court violated his right to due process of law by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Jane Kozlowicz v. Jeffrey David Schwartz
, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking additional testimony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking additional testimony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 98
challenge arises from the denial of a pretrial motion to represent himself at trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36652 - 2014-09-15
challenge arises from the denial of a pretrial motion to represent himself at trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36652 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06
[PDF]
Margaret J. Schwartz v. Jeffrey D. Schwartz
with her efforts to obtain financing, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8683 - 2017-09-19
with her efforts to obtain financing, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8683 - 2017-09-19