Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9411 - 9420 of 87904 for n v.

State v. Ralph Ovadal
“probably should not have done that” and we agree. See State v. Oppermann, 156 Wis. 2d 241, 246 n.2, 456
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6152 - 2005-03-31

State v. William Speener
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William Speener
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12022 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Harris
and we will not address them. See State v. Grade, 165 Wis.2d 143, 151 n.2, 477 N.W.2d 315, 318 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12855 - 2005-03-31

State v. Annette S.
of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Annette S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6495 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thornon T.
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. THORNON T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10301 - 2005-03-31

State v. John Yang
, “such deference is gratifying,” State v. Koput, 142 Wis. 2d 370, 386 n.12, 418 N.W.2d 804 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4649 - 2005-03-31

State v. Karen A.O.
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. KAREN A. O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10929 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sterling Rachwal
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sterling Rachwal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13794 - 2005-03-31

State v. William D.H.
, petitioner-respondent, v. william d.h., respondent-appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7059 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dexter Sallis
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dexter Sallis, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21123 - 2006-01-30