Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9411 - 9420 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 9411 - 9420 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Micro Colorgraphics, Inc. v. Robert and Nancy Unger
of evidence, however, the trial court refused to instruct the jury on misrepresentation. Although the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8313 - 2005-03-31
of evidence, however, the trial court refused to instruct the jury on misrepresentation. Although the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. Howard argues that the trial court committed plain error at trial when it admitted evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187276 - 2017-09-21
trial. Howard argues that the trial court committed plain error at trial when it admitted evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187276 - 2017-09-21
State v. Diane M. Mikic
to death. She challenges the trial court’s refusal to suppress statements she gave to the police after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
to death. She challenges the trial court’s refusal to suppress statements she gave to the police after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Debra Jungwirth v. Jefferson F. Ray, M.D.
and irreversible brain damage as a result. The jury found Ray not negligent and the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8014 - 2017-09-19
and irreversible brain damage as a result. The jury found Ray not negligent and the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8014 - 2017-09-19
County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Dillis V. Allen appeals from a judgment of the trial court convicting him for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6199 - 2005-03-31
ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Dillis V. Allen appeals from a judgment of the trial court convicting him for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6199 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Micro Colorgraphics, Inc. v. Robert and Nancy Unger
during the course of the business relationship. At the close of evidence, however, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8313 - 2017-09-19
during the course of the business relationship. At the close of evidence, however, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8313 - 2017-09-19
William Schleichert v. Columbia County
the action under § 805.03, Stats. The sole issue is whether the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9390 - 2005-03-31
the action under § 805.03, Stats. The sole issue is whether the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9390 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to present witnesses in his own defense was denied when the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to present witnesses in his own defense was denied when the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Polak
as a repeat offender and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Polak argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4172 - 2017-09-19
as a repeat offender and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Polak argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4172 - 2017-09-19
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
, Thomas Mumaw appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to reduce his obligations for maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
, Thomas Mumaw appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to reduce his obligations for maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31