Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9421 - 9430 of 64235 for records/1000.
Search results 9421 - 9430 of 64235 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116388 - 2014-07-08
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116388 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207740 - 2018-01-30
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207740 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1085-CRNM 2 record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2024AP1085-CRNM 2 record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
State v. Rodney Dombrowski
the totality of the record to determine whether Dombrowski’s waiver of counsel was the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5774 - 2017-09-19
the totality of the record to determine whether Dombrowski’s waiver of counsel was the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5774 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul R. Askew
forty years to nine years. Due to Askew’s minimal record, the circuit court sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13958 - 2014-09-15
forty years to nine years. Due to Askew’s minimal record, the circuit court sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13958 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147480 - 2017-09-21
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, No. 2018AP2133-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261690 - 2020-05-27
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, No. 2018AP2133-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261690 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP866-CRNM 2 of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582581 - 2022-10-27
. No. 2021AP866-CRNM 2 of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582581 - 2022-10-27
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144555 - 2015-07-13
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144555 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197226 - 2017-10-04
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197226 - 2017-10-04