Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9431 - 9440 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9431 - 9440 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the standard for reasonable suspicion. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789574 - 2024-04-17
N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the standard for reasonable suspicion. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789574 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
Spencer McClain v. Marianne A. Cooke
determine de novo whether the DOC acted within its jurisdiction, whether it acted according to applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11300 - 2017-09-19
determine de novo whether the DOC acted within its jurisdiction, whether it acted according to applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11300 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
decision de novo to determine as a question of law whether the challenger has satisfied the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93178 - 2013-02-20
decision de novo to determine as a question of law whether the challenger has satisfied the necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93178 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion without a hearing, and Abt now appeals. We review de novo whether a defendant’s motion under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245275 - 2019-08-21
motion without a hearing, and Abt now appeals. We review de novo whether a defendant’s motion under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245275 - 2019-08-21
State v. Richard A. Molinaro
the application of Wis. Stat. § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4311 - 2005-03-31
the application of Wis. Stat. § 973.12(1) to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4311 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
determination is, however, de novo. Id., 2005 WI 48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d at 751, 695 N.W.2d at 282. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32654 - 2008-05-12
determination is, however, de novo. Id., 2005 WI 48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d at 751, 695 N.W.2d at 282. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32654 - 2008-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 Appellate review of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
). STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 Appellate review of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Priest Johnson
court reviews de novo. Id. at 554. ¶11 Johnson’s motion for access to transcripts and his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24596 - 2017-09-21
court reviews de novo. Id. at 554. ¶11 Johnson’s motion for access to transcripts and his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24596 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathan R. Blount
performance was deficient and prejudicial,” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8730 - 2005-03-31
performance was deficient and prejudicial,” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2009 WI 70, ¶7, 318 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88858 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2009 WI 70, ¶7, 318 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88858 - 2014-09-15