Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9431 - 9440 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
Search results 9431 - 9440 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App. 1983) (“A sentence well within the limits of the maximum sentence is not so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App. 1983) (“A sentence well within the limits of the maximum sentence is not so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91196 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. App. 1983), that the juvenile court erred when it “reimposed a restitution condition of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222231 - 2018-10-12
. App. 1983), that the juvenile court erred when it “reimposed a restitution condition of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222231 - 2018-10-12
[PDF]
Village of Little Chute v. Todd A. Walitalo
N.W.2d 559 (Ct. App. 1983). Second, Walitalo argues that the blood draw could not be lawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4597 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 559 (Ct. App. 1983). Second, Walitalo argues that the blood draw could not be lawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983). In Helm, the United States Supreme Court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836705 - 2024-08-13
v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983). In Helm, the United States Supreme Court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836705 - 2024-08-13
E.A. Richards v. Grunau Company, Inc.
, 334 N.W.2d 883, 885 (1983). We conclude that Richards's cause of action was barred under the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11346 - 2005-03-31
, 334 N.W.2d 883, 885 (1983). We conclude that Richards's cause of action was barred under the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 119, 123, 332 N.W.2d 744 (1983). Finally, we agree with counsel’s conclusion in the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
. 2d 119, 123, 332 N.W.2d 744 (1983). Finally, we agree with counsel’s conclusion in the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
COURT OF APPEALS
Guthrie v. WERC, 111 Wis. 2d 447, 449, 331 N.W.2d 331 (1983). We are bound by a circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59875 - 2011-02-15
Guthrie v. WERC, 111 Wis. 2d 447, 449, 331 N.W.2d 331 (1983). We are bound by a circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59875 - 2011-02-15
State v. James D. Krause
an erroneous exercise of discretion. Schmid v. Olsen, 111 Wis. 2d 228, 237, 330 N.W.2d 547 (1983). While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
an erroneous exercise of discretion. Schmid v. Olsen, 111 Wis. 2d 228, 237, 330 N.W.2d 547 (1983). While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dale A. Gleffe v. Romayne R. Gleffe
evidence. See Noll v. Dimiceli’s Inc., 115 Wis. 2d 641, 644, 340 N.W.2d 575 (Ct. App. 1983). Dale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4524 - 2017-09-19
evidence. See Noll v. Dimiceli’s Inc., 115 Wis. 2d 641, 644, 340 N.W.2d 575 (Ct. App. 1983). Dale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4524 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498 (1983). Because the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31
v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498 (1983). Because the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31