Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9441 - 9450 of 63957 for records.
Search results 9441 - 9450 of 63957 for records.
Lynnette M. Branshaw v. Larry L. Stormer
is not to search the record for evidence contrary to the jury’s verdict; rather, we must search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20741 - 2005-12-21
is not to search the record for evidence contrary to the jury’s verdict; rather, we must search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20741 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97267 - 2013-05-28
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97267 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
Allen J. Thomas v. State
acquitted on the same charge in 1975 and if the trial court would have examined the 1975 record, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8506 - 2017-09-19
acquitted on the same charge in 1975 and if the trial court would have examined the 1975 record, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8506 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to overturn a judgment of conviction from 2013. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697383 - 2023-08-31
to overturn a judgment of conviction from 2013. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697383 - 2023-08-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235456 - 2019-02-19
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235456 - 2019-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel shall be allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592796 - 2022-11-22
reviewed the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel shall be allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592796 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258006 - 2020-04-15
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258006 - 2020-04-15
Adrian Lomax v. Warden
that the committee shall consider "only the evidence presented to it and the inmate's records." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9081 - 2005-03-31
that the committee shall consider "only the evidence presented to it and the inmate's records." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9081 - 2005-03-31