Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9451 - 9460 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9451 - 9460 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo.” Id. If a modification of child support is warranted, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105211 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo.” Id. If a modification of child support is warranted, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105211 - 2017-09-21
Traci L. Roberts v. Matthew A. Roberts
401, 647 N.W.2d 426. We may therefore determine the question de novo, even if the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7555 - 2005-03-31
401, 647 N.W.2d 426. We may therefore determine the question de novo, even if the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7555 - 2005-03-31
State v. John M. Shelley
statute to the facts of the particular case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12637 - 2005-03-31
statute to the facts of the particular case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Mola
, the determination of the appropriate amount of sentence credit is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13860 - 2014-09-15
, the determination of the appropriate amount of sentence credit is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13860 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to credit based on a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
to credit based on a given set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
James E. Jahnke v. Dennis Brown
. ¶5 Interpretation of contracts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Koenings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2267 - 2005-03-31
. ¶5 Interpretation of contracts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Koenings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2267 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question that the appellate court reviews de novo and without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32060 - 2008-03-11
is a question that the appellate court reviews de novo and without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32060 - 2008-03-11
State v. Michael A. Sveum
also State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997) (applying de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15993 - 2005-03-31
also State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997) (applying de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15993 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 115
, is a felony or a misdemeanor. Resolving this question requires statutory interpretation, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37735 - 2009-08-25
, is a felony or a misdemeanor. Resolving this question requires statutory interpretation, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37735 - 2009-08-25
County of Dane v. Kellie Ann Dixon
is a question of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s analysis. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12119 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s analysis. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12119 - 2005-03-31