Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9451 - 9460 of 68963 for did.
Search results 9451 - 9460 of 68963 for did.
State v. Latasha J.
judgment violated her due process rights because she did not receive proper notice of the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6061 - 2005-03-31
judgment violated her due process rights because she did not receive proper notice of the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6061 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the grounds that the circuit court did not advise him that it was not bound by the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995192 - 2025-08-12
on the grounds that the circuit court did not advise him that it was not bound by the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995192 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He argues that he did not enter his guilty plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35586 - 2014-09-15
. He argues that he did not enter his guilty plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35586 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Leslie J. Schatz v. Gary R. McCaughtry
challenges to the decision, we conclude the adjustment committee did not err; on the remaining issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3364 - 2017-09-19
challenges to the decision, we conclude the adjustment committee did not err; on the remaining issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3364 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
the opinion that she did not need medication and had no interest in knowing about medication. He believed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103200 - 2013-10-21
the opinion that she did not need medication and had no interest in knowing about medication. He believed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103200 - 2013-10-21
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Kimber
provocation and loss of self-control.[1] Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9613 - 2005-03-31
provocation and loss of self-control.[1] Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9613 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
although an expert witness was required to support her claims. Gladney did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470379 - 2022-01-11
although an expert witness was required to support her claims. Gladney did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470379 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion. McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d at 282. We conclude that the sentencing court did not rely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05
discretion. McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d at 282. We conclude that the sentencing court did not rely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05
State v. Joel M. Furst
juror said during voir dire that it was not Furst’s first-offense and the trial court’s instruction did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5379 - 2005-03-31
juror said during voir dire that it was not Furst’s first-offense and the trial court’s instruction did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5379 - 2005-03-31