Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9451 - 9460 of 83833 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 9451 - 9460 of 83833 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
setback, minimum lot size, and frontage requirements. This case comes to us following certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211941 - 2018-04-25
setback, minimum lot size, and frontage requirements. This case comes to us following certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211941 - 2018-04-25
Anita Roberts v. Manitowoc County Board of Adjustment
2006 WI App 169 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2111 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25782 - 2006-08-29
2006 WI App 169 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2111 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25782 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
covered the case. Without naming Parker, the first article No. 2014AP2098-CR 3 indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157514 - 2017-09-21
covered the case. Without naming Parker, the first article No. 2014AP2098-CR 3 indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Anita Roberts v. Manitowoc County Board of Adjustment
2006 WI APP 169 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25782 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 169 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25782 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based on reasoning that differs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based on reasoning that differs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement should have been suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
statement should have been suppressed as a result of a warrantless search. We affirm, albeit based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl R. Kramer
2000 WI App 271 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 271 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carl R. Kramer
2000 WI App 271 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 271 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cedric Holze
contends that: (1) ยง 948.12 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
contends that: (1) ยง 948.12 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cedric Holze
in his case; (2) there was insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that he possessed a pictorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6559 - 2017-09-19
in his case; (2) there was insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that he possessed a pictorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6559 - 2017-09-19