Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
State v. Randolph A. Clark
a refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test is proper or improper “is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
a refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test is proper or improper “is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. John S.
the trial court's decision de novo. See Breier v. E.C., 130 Wis.2d 376, 381, 387 N.W.2d 72, 74 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10159 - 2005-03-31
the trial court's decision de novo. See Breier v. E.C., 130 Wis.2d 376, 381, 387 N.W.2d 72, 74 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10159 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29632 - 2014-09-15
right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29632 - 2014-09-15
Wildeck, Inc. v. Thomas J. Cousar
. The existence of personal jurisdiction is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. The burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3457 - 2005-03-31
. The existence of personal jurisdiction is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. The burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3457 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Discussion ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant or denial of a motion to dismiss. Wisconsin Mfrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660087 - 2023-05-24
. Discussion ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant or denial of a motion to dismiss. Wisconsin Mfrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660087 - 2023-05-24
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Powers
obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15578 - 2017-09-21
obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15578 - 2017-09-21
Dunn County v. Kelly D.
of Wis. Stat. § 48.29, a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kywanda F., 200 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3125 - 2005-03-31
of Wis. Stat. § 48.29, a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kywanda F., 200 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3125 - 2005-03-31
Frederick Rogers v. DOC
or action is a question of law that we decide de novo. See Erickson Oil Prods., Inc. v. State, 184 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21703 - 2006-03-08
or action is a question of law that we decide de novo. See Erickson Oil Prods., Inc. v. State, 184 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21703 - 2006-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” Id. ¶5 After reviewing the trial testimony, we conclude that the sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07
review de novo.” Id. ¶5 After reviewing the trial testimony, we conclude that the sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60767 - 2011-03-07