Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 68502 for did.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 68502 for did.
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Jones
jurors; and (3) because he did not personally waive his right to a twelve-person jury trial, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16139 - 2005-03-31
jurors; and (3) because he did not personally waive his right to a twelve-person jury trial, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16139 - 2005-03-31
TOPS Club, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
.” TOPS admits that it did not follow the procedure mandated by Wis. Stat. § 74.35, even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5476 - 2005-03-31
.” TOPS admits that it did not follow the procedure mandated by Wis. Stat. § 74.35, even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5476 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
; (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing the sentence it did; (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that he is entitled to resentencing on grounds that the circuit court did not articulate its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73368 - 2011-11-08
contends that he is entitled to resentencing on grounds that the circuit court did not articulate its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73368 - 2011-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether the circuit court complied with D.J.W. or what the proper remedy would be if the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456986 - 2021-11-30
whether the circuit court complied with D.J.W. or what the proper remedy would be if the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456986 - 2021-11-30
Mary L. Gulmire v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
coverage and concluded this did not violate the omnibus statute. Because the automobile insurance did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6447 - 2005-03-31
coverage and concluded this did not violate the omnibus statute. Because the automobile insurance did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the driver-side trailer door.” Misiaszek did not see the pallet leaning on the door as he was opening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526500 - 2022-06-01
the driver-side trailer door.” Misiaszek did not see the pallet leaning on the door as he was opening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526500 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Avery
without a hearing. We conclude that the facts set forth in Avery’s motion, even if true, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
without a hearing. We conclude that the facts set forth in Avery’s motion, even if true, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
and a state retirement account having a value of about $7,500 at that time. Mary testified that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27095 - 2014-09-15
and a state retirement account having a value of about $7,500 at that time. Mary testified that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27095 - 2014-09-15