Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 33970 for dismissed.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 33970 for dismissed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right to appeal, and entitles him to dismissal of his convictions. ¶3 The record reveals a slightly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101932 - 2017-09-21
right to appeal, and entitles him to dismissal of his convictions. ¶3 The record reveals a slightly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101932 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Yates
. App. 1997), Yates’s motion to dismiss was granted prior to sentencing. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
. App. 1997), Yates’s motion to dismiss was granted prior to sentencing. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the claim under the safe place statute. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32774 - 2014-09-15
court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the claim under the safe place statute. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32774 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Allen
filed a motion to dismiss based on a denial of his right to a speedy trial. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5814 - 2017-09-19
filed a motion to dismiss based on a denial of his right to a speedy trial. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5814 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Haughney, granted Quiles’s motion for reconsideration on the motion to suppress and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
Haughney, granted Quiles’s motion for reconsideration on the motion to suppress and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
State v. Avery T., Jr.
to the two obstructing charges in both of the files and then the OVWOC would be dismissed. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
to the two obstructing charges in both of the files and then the OVWOC would be dismissed. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
State v. Curtis A. Moss
] Moss moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that he was not subject to criminal penalties because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14358 - 2005-03-31
] Moss moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that he was not subject to criminal penalties because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14358 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not raise any new issues in his motion for reconsideration, we lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073006 - 2026-02-04
not raise any new issues in his motion for reconsideration, we lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073006 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
City of New London v. James E. Knaus
then be dismissed. No. 02-0052 3 …. THE COURT: Do you intend to somehow raise that the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4809 - 2017-09-20
then be dismissed. No. 02-0052 3 …. THE COURT: Do you intend to somehow raise that the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4809 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
. at 873. Alderman contends that counsel’s failure to obtain dismissal of one of the two enhancers under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
. at 873. Alderman contends that counsel’s failure to obtain dismissal of one of the two enhancers under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21