Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 63559 for records.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 63559 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it was issued “for the reasons stated on the record,” but there is no transcript of the hearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118673 - 2014-09-15
it was issued “for the reasons stated on the record,” but there is no transcript of the hearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118673 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP541-CRNM 2 report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245022 - 2019-08-13
. No. 2018AP541-CRNM 2 report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245022 - 2019-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144507 - 2017-09-21
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144507 - 2017-09-21
Woodland Hills Land Company v. County of Door
very little authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9542 - 2005-03-31
very little authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Allen J. Thomas v. State
acquitted on the same charge in 1975 and if the trial court would have examined the 1975 record, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8506 - 2017-09-19
acquitted on the same charge in 1975 and if the trial court would have examined the 1975 record, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8506 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260755 - 2020-05-21
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260755 - 2020-05-21
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
upon the record to justify their individual acts. That their acts have no basis in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
upon the record to justify their individual acts. That their acts have no basis in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to Hogan’s filing. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Hogan’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789630 - 2024-04-17
to Hogan’s filing. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Hogan’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789630 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324729 - 2021-01-20
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324729 - 2021-01-20