Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 9461 - 9470 of 58542 for speedy trial.
CA Blank Order
for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether jurors were asleep during trial, and denying his alternative request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95486 - 2013-04-10
for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether jurors were asleep during trial, and denying his alternative request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95486 - 2013-04-10
[PDF]
Charmane T. Barber v. Kelly J. Barber
from Charmane Vanier. He claims the trial court No. 2005AP3056 2 erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26591 - 2017-09-21
from Charmane Vanier. He claims the trial court No. 2005AP3056 2 erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Backhaus
on the grounds that the trial court erred when it permitted the State to introduce evidence that he refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9356 - 2017-09-19
on the grounds that the trial court erred when it permitted the State to introduce evidence that he refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9356 - 2017-09-19
State v. Abel Silva
. Silva claims: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7980 - 2005-03-31
. Silva claims: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7980 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martwon Brown
for postconviction relief. Brown claims that the trial court erred when it denied his request to enlarge the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24741 - 2006-04-10
for postconviction relief. Brown claims that the trial court erred when it denied his request to enlarge the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24741 - 2006-04-10
State v. Todd M. Beyersdorf
of a child and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14921 - 2005-03-31
of a child and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of burglary, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2009-10). 2 During sentencing, the trial court asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108113 - 2017-09-21
of burglary, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2009-10). 2 During sentencing, the trial court asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108113 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on direct appeal because he knew about two of the four issues prior to his 1995 jury trial, and one we had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32439 - 2008-04-14
on direct appeal because he knew about two of the four issues prior to his 1995 jury trial, and one we had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32439 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
to his 1995 jury trial, and one we had already decided adversely to him. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32439 - 2014-09-15
to his 1995 jury trial, and one we had already decided adversely to him. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32439 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
made was not illegal and therefore there was no reasonable suspicion to justify the stop. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141300 - 2015-05-05
made was not illegal and therefore there was no reasonable suspicion to justify the stop. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141300 - 2015-05-05