Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9471 - 9480 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9471 - 9480 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In November 2012, eight months after the divorce, Alan moved to modify maintenance. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114810 - 2017-09-21
In November 2012, eight months after the divorce, Alan moved to modify maintenance. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114810 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
maintenance. The motion alleged there had been a substantial change in financial circumstances, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114810 - 2014-06-16
maintenance. The motion alleged there had been a substantial change in financial circumstances, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114810 - 2014-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals the order denying the joint postconviction motion he filed in the two cases. Harmon argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218007 - 2018-08-17
appeals the order denying the joint postconviction motion he filed in the two cases. Harmon argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218007 - 2018-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
of cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2009-10).[1] Huff argues that his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
of cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2009-10).[1] Huff argues that his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
CA Blank Order
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground of failure to assume parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34738 - 2008-11-25
the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground of failure to assume parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34738 - 2008-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppression motion should have been granted. We reject his suppression argument. ¶2 Huff also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
suppression motion should have been granted. We reject his suppression argument. ¶2 Huff also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in accordance with WIS. STAT. [RULE] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15
in accordance with WIS. STAT. [RULE] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15