Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9471 - 9480 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 9471 - 9480 of 83278 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant was executed at Cardoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant was executed at Cardoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was missing its file on Mayotte’s open felony case. ¶5 Officers subsequently executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
was missing its file on Mayotte’s open felony case. ¶5 Officers subsequently executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
directly to Dr. Goeckner. The cases were consolidated. ¶10 The case went before a jury. At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96733 - 2013-05-13
directly to Dr. Goeckner. The cases were consolidated. ¶10 The case went before a jury. At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96733 - 2013-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The judgment was entered by the Honorable William W. Brash, III, who presided over the case following judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96733 - 2014-09-15
. The judgment was entered by the Honorable William W. Brash, III, who presided over the case following judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96733 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James Freer v. Zimbrick, Inc.
. The case was tried to the court. The facts were substantially in dispute, but the court ultimately found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12914 - 2017-09-21
. The case was tried to the court. The facts were substantially in dispute, but the court ultimately found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12914 - 2017-09-21
James Freer v. Zimbrick, Inc.
to his purchase of a used car from Zimbrick. The case was tried to the court. The facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12914 - 2005-03-31
to his purchase of a used car from Zimbrick. The case was tried to the court. The facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446861 - 2021-10-28
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446861 - 2021-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Jose G. Corpus
informant. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Executing a search warrant, police found more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19314 - 2017-09-21
informant. We affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Executing a search warrant, police found more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19314 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the circuit court denied Miller’s motion to suppress statements and evidence due to unlawful search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49203 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court denied Miller’s motion to suppress statements and evidence due to unlawful search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49203 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
search of the pickup truck and located a glass container2 in Sobotik’s fishing jacket which Bublitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929659 - 2025-03-19
search of the pickup truck and located a glass container2 in Sobotik’s fishing jacket which Bublitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929659 - 2025-03-19