Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9471 - 9480 of 16407 for commentating.

State v. Derek E.
are representative of the court’s comments at both hearings: There have been 21 referrals and several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13282 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ventae Parrow
. The trial court, in commenting on why Parrow received two maximum consecutive sentences, said “Anything less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
order. We briefly comment on the issues Roberts did raise on appeal in order to explain why we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246148 - 2019-09-04

Michelle L. Fisher v. Joseph R. Powers
and commentators because of the substantial injustice which frequently results from its application.” Schwabe v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14290 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
of Cory’s responsibility and the lack of “black marks” on his record as a parent. We will not comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30314 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Joseph Hazen
U.S. 460 (1983), methodology for nonprisoner cases. However, the majority did comment "[t]hat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9075 - 2017-09-19

Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
within LIRC's authority and must be resolved by LIRC without comment or input from this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8183 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mareese Anderson
was an improper factor. To support his claim, Anderson cites the trial court’s comment: “People ask what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony Walker
and impermissibly comment on the credibility of another witness. The trial court also limited cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11837 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Christopher P. Marshall
. 4 Defense counsel commented on his failure to bring the matter to the court’s attention prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4778 - 2017-09-19