Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9471 - 9480 of 63485 for records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206751 - 2018-01-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250769 - 2019-12-04

CA Blank Order
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144507 - 2015-07-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307476 - 2020-11-25

State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
of intoxication in the record. Accordingly, we affirm. State trooper Tracy Fuller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31

Dale P.A. v. Becky W.P.
that the child has actually suffered harm. Id. The record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10811 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194383 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Scheeler first argues that he should be given a new trial because certain medical records were admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44982 - 2009-12-22

COURT OF APPEALS
that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s argument and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31141 - 2007-12-10