Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9481 - 9490 of 69630 for had.
Search results 9481 - 9490 of 69630 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed that defense counsel had “accurate[ly]” set forth the plea agreement. ¶3 In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
agreed that defense counsel had “accurate[ly]” set forth the plea agreement. ¶3 In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that a female juror had slept during the testimony. The trial court responded that it would not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
that a female juror had slept during the testimony. The trial court responded that it would not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim, who was a friend, during an argument. A witness relayed to police that Marker had told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
the victim, who was a friend, during an argument. A witness relayed to police that Marker had told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
owner, St. Mary, had an expired driver’s license. While writing a warning ticket for St. Mary, Roth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107042 - 2014-01-21
owner, St. Mary, had an expired driver’s license. While writing a warning ticket for St. Mary, Roth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107042 - 2014-01-21
City of Whitewater v. Robert P. Michor
.[1] The main issue is whether a Whitewater police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4683 - 2005-03-31
.[1] The main issue is whether a Whitewater police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4683 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The teenager further testified that on a number of prior occasions, Martin had invited her into his apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81583 - 2012-04-25
.” The teenager further testified that on a number of prior occasions, Martin had invited her into his apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81583 - 2012-04-25
Russell C. Winchel v. State Bank of Cross Plains
they had. ¶4 The bank notified the Winchels of the problem, and offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7093 - 2005-03-31
they had. ¶4 The bank notified the Winchels of the problem, and offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7093 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial after a prospective juror indicated she was the jail nurse and had treated Pearson; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32755 - 2008-05-19
a mistrial after a prospective juror indicated she was the jail nurse and had treated Pearson; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32755 - 2008-05-19
State v. Mary F.-R.
. testified that she had been promised the opportunity to speak with her cousin. When her aunt refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
. testified that she had been promised the opportunity to speak with her cousin. When her aunt refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas H. Mellum v. Catherine Ann Mellum
. Douglas and Catherine were married in March of 1989. Catherine had a daughter from a prior relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21432 - 2017-09-21
. Douglas and Catherine were married in March of 1989. Catherine had a daughter from a prior relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21432 - 2017-09-21