Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9481 - 9490 of 68207 for law.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of mandamus, punitive damages, and $100 per diem damages under the open records law, WIS. STAT. §§ 19.35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96290 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 69 (1975)). Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133147 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Richard D. Hubatch
in his blood. He requested a hearing to determine whether his refusal was lawful. The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12995 - 2017-09-21

Supreme Court of Wisconsin OPINION 11-1 Judicial Cond...
to obey the law and promote public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. For example, SCR 60.03(1
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71436 - 2011-09-21

[PDF] Stephen Sills v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
budget bill because the Black Point legislation is a “private” or “local” law within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18310 - 2017-09-21

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Frank X. Kinast
: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Frank X. Kinast, Attorney at Law. Board of Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17350 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randy D. Dziczkowski
and that it incorrectly applied the law. Because the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12996 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
is a question of law that this court decides independently. See id., ¶33. If the fact or set of facts do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133147 - 2015-01-20

[PDF] Mary Gillies v. Milwaukee County
review of the Board’s action. The petition claimed that the Board’s decision was contrary to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14206 - 2014-09-15

State v. Brian J. Buffum
the constitutional standard of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11548 - 2005-03-31