Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9481 - 9490 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 9481 - 9490 of 18714 for quote.
State v. Darwin J. Pamanet
supreme court quoted with approval United States v. Roberson, 90 F.3d 75 (3rd Cir. 1996), which concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13604 - 2005-03-31
supreme court quoted with approval United States v. Roberson, 90 F.3d 75 (3rd Cir. 1996), which concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13604 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.’” Id. (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). However, the prejudice prong is not an outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-02
in the outcome.’” Id. (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). However, the prejudice prong is not an outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-02
State v. Michael W. Farrell
understanding of the proceedings against him [or her].” Id. (quoted source omitted). Likewise in this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
understanding of the proceedings against him [or her].” Id. (quoted source omitted). Likewise in this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
quoted earlier that it was likely that Mariyana would be adopted. Thus, when the State asked her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77920 - 2012-02-13
quoted earlier that it was likely that Mariyana would be adopted. Thus, when the State asked her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77920 - 2012-02-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
N.W.2d 555 (quoting Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 (1978)). The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27286 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 555 (quoting Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 (1978)). The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27286 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that they are quoted, referenced, or described in this opinion. We also note that TL’s statement on oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812454 - 2024-06-11
that they are quoted, referenced, or described in this opinion. We also note that TL’s statement on oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812454 - 2024-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
in transcript to reflect a quote.) ¶4 Later in the hearing, Sveum testified that counsel’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
in transcript to reflect a quote.) ¶4 Later in the hearing, Sveum testified that counsel’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
State v. Mareese Anderson
questions, it seems to me.” But the quoted commentary is little more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
questions, it seems to me.” But the quoted commentary is little more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marjorie J. Jones v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
Corp., 14 Wis.2d 1, 11, 109 N.W.2d 462, 467 (1961), quoted WILLIAM L. PROSSER, TORTS § 46, at 251 (2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13230 - 2017-09-21
Corp., 14 Wis.2d 1, 11, 109 N.W.2d 462, 467 (1961), quoted WILLIAM L. PROSSER, TORTS § 46, at 251 (2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13230 - 2017-09-21
State v. James A. Kreutz
.” Richardson, 156 Wis.2d at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-22). Information received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15178 - 2005-03-31
.” Richardson, 156 Wis.2d at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-22). Information received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15178 - 2005-03-31