Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9481 - 9490 of 18666 for quote.
Search results 9481 - 9490 of 18666 for quote.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” See State v. Darcy N.K., 218 Wis. 2d 640, 667, 581 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoting State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235522 - 2019-02-20
.” See State v. Darcy N.K., 218 Wis. 2d 640, 667, 581 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoting State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235522 - 2019-02-20
State v. Romel D.
, 701, 499 N.W.2d 152, 161 (1993) (quoting State v. Paszek, 50 Wis.2d 619, 624‑25, 184 N.W.2d 836, 839
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
, 701, 499 N.W.2d 152, 161 (1993) (quoting State v. Paszek, 50 Wis.2d 619, 624‑25, 184 N.W.2d 836, 839
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts that an oral pronouncement controls only if it is unambiguous and, quoting State v. Oglesby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
asserts that an oral pronouncement controls only if it is unambiguous and, quoting State v. Oglesby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Jesse L. Pomeroy
a reasonable analysis of the evidence.’” Id. (quoted source omitted; citations omitted). Peters only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12100 - 2017-09-21
a reasonable analysis of the evidence.’” Id. (quoted source omitted; citations omitted). Peters only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12100 - 2017-09-21
Merlin Weber v. Town of Saukville
confused.” DOR v. Nagle-Hart, Inc., 70 Wis.2d 224, 227, 234 N.W.2d 350, 352 (1975) (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8076 - 2005-03-31
confused.” DOR v. Nagle-Hart, Inc., 70 Wis.2d 224, 227, 234 N.W.2d 350, 352 (1975) (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8076 - 2005-03-31
State v. Catina A. McCoy
N.W.2d at 713-714. Significantly for the instant case, the court, quoting United States v. Berryhill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10784 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 713-714. Significantly for the instant case, the court, quoting United States v. Berryhill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10784 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Anderson
sentencing proceeding.’” State v. Carter, 208 Wis.2d 142, 148, 560 N.W.2d 256, 258 (1997) (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
sentencing proceeding.’” State v. Carter, 208 Wis.2d 142, 148, 560 N.W.2d 256, 258 (1997) (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ‘capable and likely of repetition and yet evades review.’” Id. (quoting G.S. v. State, 118 Wis. 2d 803
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
is ‘capable and likely of repetition and yet evades review.’” Id. (quoting G.S. v. State, 118 Wis. 2d 803
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
State v. Stephen R. McCann
at 804 (quoted source omitted). Because we conclude that McCann’s legal rights were not violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13595 - 2017-09-21
at 804 (quoted source omitted). Because we conclude that McCann’s legal rights were not violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13595 - 2017-09-21
Janis Peters-Doering v. American Continental Insurance Company
at 189-90, 287 N.W.2d at 805 (quoting § 101.01(2)(a), Stats. 1979-80, subsequently renumbered as § 101.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11640 - 2005-03-31
at 189-90, 287 N.W.2d at 805 (quoting § 101.01(2)(a), Stats. 1979-80, subsequently renumbered as § 101.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11640 - 2005-03-31