Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9491 - 9500 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9491 - 9500 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
of cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2009-10).[1] Huff argues that his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
of cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2009-10).[1] Huff argues that his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
CA Blank Order
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground of failure to assume parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34738 - 2008-11-25
the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground of failure to assume parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34738 - 2008-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppression motion should have been granted. We reject his suppression argument. ¶2 Huff also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
suppression motion should have been granted. We reject his suppression argument. ¶2 Huff also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
Ray Mallo v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
' motion and granted summary judgment in favor of the DOR. The court, in dismissing the Mallos' action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16448 - 2005-03-31
' motion and granted summary judgment in favor of the DOR. The court, in dismissing the Mallos' action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ray Mallo v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
to by the joint committee for review of administrative rules, whichever is sooner. If a rule under par. (b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16448 - 2017-09-21
to by the joint committee for review of administrative rules, whichever is sooner. If a rule under par. (b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andrew James Garner
of burglarious tools, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
of burglarious tools, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
State v. Andrew James Garner
motion. He argues that the trial court violated his right to due process of law by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31
motion. He argues that the trial court violated his right to due process of law by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19