Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 951 - 960 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 951 - 960 of 6253 for cf.
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. House
offenses does not undermine the legitimate purpose of the wiretap statute. Cf. United States v. Giordano
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26089 - 2017-09-21
offenses does not undermine the legitimate purpose of the wiretap statute. Cf. United States v. Giordano
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26089 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The circuit court had statutory authority to impose the surcharge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1g). Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44169 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court had statutory authority to impose the surcharge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1g). Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44169 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry L. Cox
decision. Cf. State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis.2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727, 732 (1978) (probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13644 - 2005-03-31
decision. Cf. State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis.2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727, 732 (1978) (probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Clinton T. Donahue
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-1545-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-322 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4060 - 2017-09-20
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-1545-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-322 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4060 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
review of probation revocation is by way of certiorari to the court of conviction); cf. State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111770 - 2014-05-06
review of probation revocation is by way of certiorari to the court of conviction); cf. State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111770 - 2014-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Jerod R. Scott
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0210-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-39 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4867 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0210-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-39 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4867 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John Nierengarten v. State
regulations pursuant to § 48.975(5), STATS., are consistent with this interpretation. Cf. WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9950 - 2017-09-19
regulations pursuant to § 48.975(5), STATS., are consistent with this interpretation. Cf. WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9950 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Adam J. Kestell
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 04-2218-CR Cir. Ct. No. 03-CF-975 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7627 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 04-2218-CR Cir. Ct. No. 03-CF-975 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7627 - 2017-09-19
State v. David W. Oakley
of the official reports. No. 99-3328-CR (L.C. No. 98 CF 206) STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17588 - 2005-03-31
of the official reports. No. 99-3328-CR (L.C. No. 98 CF 206) STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17588 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Konaha
. Appeal No. 01-3358-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-732 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4696 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 01-3358-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-732 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4696 - 2005-03-31