Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 951 - 960 of 68466 for did.
Search results 951 - 960 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to Galvan. We hold that the officer did not use reasonable means in conveying the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55130 - 2014-09-15
to Galvan. We hold that the officer did not use reasonable means in conveying the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55130 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2007-08). He contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44738 - 2010-01-05
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2007-08). He contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44738 - 2010-01-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 appeal, but he did not pursue an appeal.2 ¶3 In 2019, Whitaker filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458313 - 2021-12-01
for a WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 appeal, but he did not pursue an appeal.2 ¶3 In 2019, Whitaker filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458313 - 2021-12-01
[PDF]
WI 117
: Dissented: Not Participating: BABLITCH and PROSSER, J.J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17542 - 2014-09-15
: Dissented: Not Participating: BABLITCH and PROSSER, J.J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17542 - 2014-09-15
State v. Frankie Groenke
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not inform Thomas of his Miranda rights because Thomas was not in custody. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
did not inform Thomas of his Miranda rights because Thomas was not in custody. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
State v. Randall M. Miller
in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. Capps
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not undermine confidence in the verdict. ¶8 We reject Laboy’s appellate arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
did not undermine confidence in the verdict. ¶8 We reject Laboy’s appellate arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
State v. Robert J. Capps
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31