Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 951 - 960 of 61717 for does.
Search results 951 - 960 of 61717 for does.
COURT OF APPEALS
resentencing. We agree with the circuit court that Miller does not apply to Hampton, so we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127949 - 2014-11-17
resentencing. We agree with the circuit court that Miller does not apply to Hampton, so we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127949 - 2014-11-17
COURT OF APPEALS
shall be entered accordingly. Section 778.20 (emphasis added). Gibbs does not assert that a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94975 - 2013-04-03
shall be entered accordingly. Section 778.20 (emphasis added). Gibbs does not assert that a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94975 - 2013-04-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the circuit court that Miller does not apply to Hampton, so we affirm the order. ¶2 Hampton was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
with the circuit court that Miller does not apply to Hampton, so we affirm the order. ¶2 Hampton was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to Tina. He argues that the circuit court decision denying his motion does not address this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111386 - 2014-04-29
to Tina. He argues that the circuit court decision denying his motion does not address this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111386 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ property. She does not develop any argument regarding the contempt order. We therefore address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227572 - 2018-11-20
’ property. She does not develop any argument regarding the contempt order. We therefore address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227572 - 2018-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
motion does not establish any reason for his failure to raise most of these issues in his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26286 - 2017-09-21
motion does not establish any reason for his failure to raise most of these issues in his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26286 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
). Ashmore’s motion does not establish any reason for his failure to raise most of these issues in his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26286 - 2006-08-28
). Ashmore’s motion does not establish any reason for his failure to raise most of these issues in his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26286 - 2006-08-28
[PDF]
Case of the month - Feb 2016
ordinance can be enforced. It concluded that: (1) § 66.0502 does not involve a matter of statewide concern
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb16.pdf - 2016-02-01
ordinance can be enforced. It concluded that: (1) § 66.0502 does not involve a matter of statewide concern
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb16.pdf - 2016-02-01
State v. Allan R. Washachek
of his probation. Because the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit a circuit court from inquiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2526 - 2005-03-31
of his probation. Because the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit a circuit court from inquiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2526 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
the court of jurisdiction. He does not specifically identify those actions that he believes should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21
the court of jurisdiction. He does not specifically identify those actions that he believes should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21