Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 951 - 960 of 20070 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
Search results 951 - 960 of 20070 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
James P. Brennan v. Timothy T. Kay
, and if he did so, Kay indicated that he would not docket the judgment. When Brennan failed to tender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8184 - 2005-03-31
, and if he did so, Kay indicated that he would not docket the judgment. When Brennan failed to tender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8184 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James P. Brennan v. Timothy T. Kay
will not address it. Segall v. Hurwitz, 114 Wis.2d 471, 489, 339 N.W.2d 333, 342 (Ct. App. 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8184 - 2017-09-19
will not address it. Segall v. Hurwitz, 114 Wis.2d 471, 489, 339 N.W.2d 333, 342 (Ct. App. 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8184 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a trial court has control over its docket. See WIS. STAT. § 802.10 (discussing circuit court’s calendar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
that a trial court has control over its docket. See WIS. STAT. § 802.10 (discussing circuit court’s calendar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
of cases on its docket. See Neylan v. Vorwald, 124 Wis. 2d 85, 94, 368 N.W.2d 648 (1985). ¶12 Welch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33051 - 2008-06-16
of cases on its docket. See Neylan v. Vorwald, 124 Wis. 2d 85, 94, 368 N.W.2d 648 (1985). ¶12 Welch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33051 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
the inherent authority to control its calendar and the disposition of cases on its docket. See Neylan v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33051 - 2014-09-15
the inherent authority to control its calendar and the disposition of cases on its docket. See Neylan v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33051 - 2014-09-15
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. § 1983.[2] ¶2 The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court in part, holding that Penterman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17086 - 2005-03-31
. § 1983.[2] ¶2 The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court in part, holding that Penterman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17086 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2 ¶2 The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court in part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17086 - 2017-09-21
remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2 ¶2 The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court in part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17086 - 2017-09-21
Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
In 1983, the legislature repealed and recreated Wis. Stat. § 801.50, the general venue statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17336 - 2005-03-31
In 1983, the legislature repealed and recreated Wis. Stat. § 801.50, the general venue statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17336 - 2005-03-31
Marcia K. Johnson v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
In 1983, the legislature repealed and recreated Wis. Stat. § 801.50, the general venue statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17347 - 2005-03-31
In 1983, the legislature repealed and recreated Wis. Stat. § 801.50, the general venue statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17347 - 2005-03-31
Frank M. Kett v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
In 1983, the legislature repealed and recreated Wis. Stat. § 801.50, the general venue statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17335 - 2005-03-31
In 1983, the legislature repealed and recreated Wis. Stat. § 801.50, the general venue statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17335 - 2005-03-31